Breaking Down Carbon Pricing: What is Driving the Cost?

Carbon pricing is a fundamental mechanism shaping the carbon market, yet determining how these prices are set requires a thorough understanding of multiple economic, regulatory, and market-driven factors. The cost of carbon is influenced by a complex interplay of supply and demand dynamics, policy interventions, and evolving market structures. Whether in compliance markets or voluntary carbon trading, carbon pricing plays a crucial role in incentivising emissions reductions and financing sustainable initiatives.

A businessman focused on financial charts in his modern office and lush forest views. AI generated picture. 

The Two Markets: Compliance vs. Voluntary Pricing

Carbon pricing differs significantly between compliance markets and voluntary carbon markets. In compliance markets, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) or California’s Cap-and-Trade Program, prices are largely dictated by government-imposed regulations and caps on emissions. These markets operate on a ‘cap-and-trade’ model where allowances are issued, auctioned, or traded, creating a fluctuating price per tonne of carbon based on supply and demand.

Voluntary carbon markets (VCMs), on the other hand, function independently of government mandates. Companies and individuals buy carbon units to compensate for their emissions, but pricing is far more variable. Prices here depend on project type, location, certification standards, and perceived co-benefits like biodiversity restoration or community impact.

Understanding Voluntary Carbon Markets in Depth

The voluntary carbon market is driven by corporate sustainability goals, investor demand, and growing public pressure for environmental responsibility. Unlike compliance markets, where emissions limits dictate pricing, VCM prices are influenced by project quality, certification standards, and market perception.

Key factors shaping VCM pricing include:

• Types of units: Nature-based solutions, such as reforestation or soil carbon sequestration, typically command higher prices due to their additional ecological and social benefits compared to industrial-based units.
• Certification and quality: Units verified by reputable organisations like Verra and the Gold Standard carry a pricing premium due to their rigorous validation processes.
• Corporate demand: Businesses with net-zero commitments often prefer high-integrity units, driving up prices for projects with strong co-benefits and long-term carbon sequestration.
• Market liquidity: While VCMs provide flexibility, price fluctuations occur due to shifts in demand, supply constraints, and evolving regulatory guidance.

A large-scale reforestation project, with workers planting saplings in a forest. AI generated picture.

The voluntary market is evolving with increasing scrutiny, pushing for higher-quality units and standardisation, which is likely to impact pricing dynamics in the coming years.

What Determines the Price of Carbon Units?

Several key factors influence carbon pricing across both markets:

• Supply and demand: Compliance markets set a cap on emissions, influencing the supply of allowances. If demand outstrips supply, prices rise. In VCMs, demand depends on corporate sustainability commitments, regulatory pressures, and market confidence in the integrity of units.
• Regulatory policies: Compliance carbon prices respond to governmental policies, with stricter regulations typically pushing prices higher. Voluntary market prices, while not directly controlled, are influenced by policy trends and corporate disclosure requirements.
• Project type and quality: Nature-based solutions like afforestation or mangrove restoration often command higher prices due to their biodiversity and social benefits, while industrial projects like methane capture tend to be priced lower.
• Market perception and integrity: The credibility of a carbon unit is vital. Units from projects that meet stringent third-party verification standards, such as Verra or Gold Standard, generally trade at higher prices due to their legitimacy and lower risk of greenwashing.
• Geographical factors: Location matters. Units from projects in countries with stable governance and strong verification frameworks tend to fetch higher prices, whereas projects in regions with weak enforcement mechanisms may struggle with pricing credibility.

A tree nursery worker inspecting seedlings. AI generated picture. 

Why Nature-Based Solutions Command Higher Prices

Nature-based solutions (NBS) are among the most sought-after carbon units in the voluntary market, often selling at a premium compared to industrial-based units. Several factors contribute to their higher pricing:

• Co-benefits beyond carbon: Unlike some industrial projects that solely focus on emissions reduction, NBS projects—such as reforestation, mangrove restoration, and soil carbon sequestration—offer additional environmental and social benefits. These include biodiversity conservation, improved water security, and enhanced livelihoods for local communities.
• Scarcity and high demand: High-quality NBS units are in limited supply, while corporate buyers increasingly prefer them due to their alignment with broader sustainability goals. Companies aiming for nature-positive targets seek these units to demonstrate holistic environmental responsibility.
• Verification and standards: NBS projects require rigorous monitoring and verification, often increasing costs. Units from well-certified projects fetch higher prices due to their credibility.
• Long-term carbon storage: Projects like afforestation and wetland restoration offer durable carbon sequestration, which adds to their attractiveness compared to units from shorter-term solutions such as avoided deforestation or methane capture.

With increasing scrutiny on carbon offsetting, nature-based solutions are likely to see sustained demand, reinforcing their position as premium-priced assets within the carbon market.

The Volatility of Carbon Pricing

Carbon prices are far from stable. In compliance markets, geopolitical developments, economic conditions, and policy changes can drive significant price swings. For instance, EU ETS carbon prices have seen major fluctuations, rising above €100 per tonne in 2023 before dropping amid economic slowdowns.

In VCMs, price volatility stems from market sentiment and shifting corporate attitudes. A rise in net-zero commitments can spike demand and prices, while market skepticism or oversupply can send prices plummeting. The voluntary market has also faced challenges with credit oversupply, as seen with older, lower-quality credits that struggle to find buyers.

The Future of Carbon Pricing

As carbon markets mature, pricing mechanisms are evolving. The push for higher-quality units and standardisation in VCMs is expected to stabilise prices, while compliance markets continue to be shaped by policy tightening and carbon border mechanisms like the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

A key factor to watch is the increasing integration of voluntary and compliance markets. Some jurisdictions are considering hybrid models that allow voluntary units to count toward compliance targets under strict conditions, potentially boosting prices and liquidity in both markets.

Young green saplings reaching for the sky, bathed in soft sunlight. AI generated picture.

Ultimately, the true cost of carbon is about more than just price—it reflects the world’s collective effort to assign a financial value to emissions reduction. As carbon markets continue to expand, understanding pricing dynamics will remain crucial for investors, companies, and policymakers navigating this evolving landscape.