TikTok’s Environmental Impact Sparks Concerns
TikTok’s carbon emissions surpass Greece’s annual total. A study finds user engagement drives high environmental costs.
A new study highlights that TikTok's annual carbon emissions may surpass Greece’s total emissions, raising questions about the platform's environmental sustainability. Research by Greenly, a Paris-based carbon accounting firm, found that TikTok generated approximately 7.6 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e) in 2023 across the U.S., U.K., and France—more than Twitter/X and Snapchat combined. Despite having nearly twice the user base, Instagram’s emissions were only marginally higher.
Close-up of a person using a phone to edit a TikTok video featuring a group of teenagers dancing in a park. AI generated picture.
The study attributes TikTok’s large carbon footprint to its highly addictive nature, with users spending an average of 45.5 minutes daily on the platform—significantly more than Instagram’s 30.6 minutes. Greenly notes that TikTok’s algorithm, designed to maximise video engagement, drives longer user sessions and higher emissions per user.
TikTok’s total global emissions likely exceed 50 million metric tonnes of CO 2 e, with the report noting this figure excludes emissions from office operations or employee commuting. For context, Greece’s 2023 carbon emissions stood at 51.67 million metric tonnes of CO 2 e.
Among social media platforms, TikTok ranks second in emissions per minute of use, producing 2.921 grams of CO 2 e—slightly less than YouTube. On an annual scale, the average TikTok user generates 48.49kg of CO 2 e, equivalent to driving 123 miles in a gasoline-powered car.
Unlike Meta and Google, TikTok has yet to publicly disclose its emissions data. While it has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 through its ‘Project Clover’ initiative, the company’s progress remains limited. To date, TikTok has only launched one renewable energy-powered data centre in Norway.
More on News
The Climate Action Gap: Why Most Companies Fall Short on Execution
A new report reveals a stark disconnect between corporate climate commitments and the operational infrastructure needed to deliver tangible results.
The timing mismatch between green spending and carbon credit returns
Financing green projects requires upfront capital before carbon credits generate any measurable revenue, creating a critical cash flow challenge for transition initiatives.
Carbon180 Outlines Federal Policy Framework for Agricultural Carbon Removal
The think tank's new roadmap identifies specific government actions needed to unlock carbon dioxide removal potential across U.S. farmland.